Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
theory:navigation [30/03/2011 09:03] – [Navigation Methods] admin | theory:navigation [30/03/2011 12:40] – [Summary Outline] admin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[theory: | [[theory: | ||
- | Using clean language and clean space allows us to navigate these worlds. | + | Using Emergent Knowledge techniques |
Solutions are found at a different level than the problem is stated, by using simple dynamic rules that transform complexity into a route that can be navigated. The primary world is the level in which the problem is stated and the solution is found in secondary and tertiary worlds, which are at different levels to the problem. | Solutions are found at a different level than the problem is stated, by using simple dynamic rules that transform complexity into a route that can be navigated. The primary world is the level in which the problem is stated and the solution is found in secondary and tertiary worlds, which are at different levels to the problem. | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* Index Cards | * Index Cards | ||
+ | ===== Summary Outline ===== | ||
+ | Navigation of the client’s worlds is a truly rewarding process; new information and new insights will emerge. As facilitators we should be aware of how the client is describing their world now and their earlier worlds, their use of pronouns and location of feelings, their gestures and non-verbal language. All of these provide us with clues to aid our client in discovering even the smallest piece of information that once known, may dissolve the issue totally. | ||
+ | The [[theory: | ||
+ | |||
+ | We shall also take our first step in having the client externalise their internal world by [[theory: |