Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
theory:space_abc [30/03/2011 07:21] – [Asking Questions of the Spaces] admintheory:space_abc [05/04/2018 15:54] (current) – [Spaces and Client Perspectives] admin
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 {{ theory:figure_07.png |xxx}} {{ theory:figure_07.png |xxx}}
-;#;+<WRAP centeralign>
 <sup>Figure 7</sup> <sup>Figure 7</sup>
-;#;+</WRAP>
  
 ===== The Three Spaces ===== ===== The Three Spaces =====
Line 12: Line 12:
 When the observer chooses the place they want to sit or stand in respect to their mission statement, this place and the space around them becomes the ‘Space of A’, this space holds who they are and what they know at the beginning of the session. When the observer chooses the place they want to sit or stand in respect to their mission statement, this place and the space around them becomes the ‘Space of A’, this space holds who they are and what they know at the beginning of the session.
  
-Throughout the session, the client needs to be returned to this position occasionally, because this is the position that defines the edge of their [[theory:primary_world|Primary World]], which has become the problem boundary.+Throughout the session, the client needs to be returned to this position occasionally, because this is the position that defines the edge of their [[theory:primary_world|Primary World]].
  
 They will also need to go back to this position to end the session. As when they are in a different positions/spaces during the process they may be in the state of mind where they are at different ages. Returning to the space of A will ensure they are in their right mental state, as a whole person. They will also need to go back to this position to end the session. As when they are in a different positions/spaces during the process they may be in the state of mind where they are at different ages. Returning to the space of A will ensure they are in their right mental state, as a whole person.
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 {{ theory:figure_08.png |xxx}} {{ theory:figure_08.png |xxx}}
-;#;+<WRAP centeralign>
 <sup>Figure 8</sup> <sup>Figure 8</sup>
-;#;+</WRAP>
  
 ===== Asking Questions of the Spaces ===== ===== Asking Questions of the Spaces =====
Line 34: Line 34:
 In the space of A, a person may hold a particular view of the world; that is only true as long as they sit there. But if they were asked to move to another space they are then equally capable of discounting everything they said in the previous position. In the space of A, a person may hold a particular view of the world; that is only true as long as they sit there. But if they were asked to move to another space they are then equally capable of discounting everything they said in the previous position.
  
-The concept of moving to another space is known as ‘adjacency’ because we are moving the client to adjacent spaces within their problem space. This problem space can actually be represented by expanding the ‘Space of C’ so that it contains both A and B. In reality this is the true basic structure of the problem, i.e. the problem space, its boundaries and limits are what is keeping A and B in this feud, it is what is stopping A and/or B from being resolved.+The concept of moving to another space is known as [[theory:adjacency]] because we are moving the client to adjacent spaces within their [[theory:problem_space|problem space]]. This problem space can actually be represented by expanding the ‘Space of C’ so that it contains both A and B. In reality this is the true basic structure of the problem, i.e. the problem space, its boundaries and limits are what is keeping A and B in this feud, it is what is stopping A and/or B from being resolved.
  
- +{{ theory:figure_09.png |xxx}} 
-Figure 9+<WRAP centeralign> 
 +<sup>Figure 9</sup> 
 +</WRAP>