Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
theory:aim [28/03/2011 12:32] – created admin | theory:aim [05/04/2018 15:50] (current) – [Introduction] admin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== The Aim of Working with Worlds ====== | ====== The Aim of Working with Worlds ====== | ||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
- | In order to live and respond to the Real World, to the best of our abilities, we need all aspects (fragments) of ourselves to be re-united into our [[theory: | + | In order to live and respond to the real world, to the best of our abilities, we need all aspects (fragments) of ourselves to be re-united into our [[theory:primary_world|Primary World]]. |
The overall purpose of this work is to create the context in which a client can accomplish this. | The overall purpose of this work is to create the context in which a client can accomplish this. | ||
- | This ‘United’ state then, enables our Primary World to be scaled correctly to the real world and to have a good relationship with what the real world is. Donald Winnicott’s interpretation of this ‘United’ state is represented in his definition of a healthy individual: | + | This ‘United’ state then, enables our [[theory: |
- | 4 | + | <WRAP round notice 80% center> |
+ | “The healthy individual does not become isolated, but becomes related to the environment in such a way that the individual and the environment can be said to be interdependent.” - D.W.Winnicott | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | ===== The End Game ===== | ||
+ | We are not proposing that working with the Emergent Knowledge processes will make the real world OK. The aim is to make our internal representation of it healthy and therefore enable us to be more effective in managing it. | ||
- | We are not proposing that working with the Emergent Knowledge processes will make the real world ok; the aim is to make our internal representation of it healthy and therefore enables us to be effective in managing it. For example, you could be living in a disaster zone, where you have to adapt and interact to survive; after Emergent Knowledge processing the disaster zone will continue to be a disaster zone however your representation and response to it will have changed. | + | For example, you could be living in a disaster zone, where you have to adapt and interact to survive; after Emergent Knowledge processing the disaster zone will continue to be a disaster zone however your representation and response to it will have changed. |
- | The objective then is to integrate these disparate worlds (Primary, Secondary and Tertiary) into one and for the boundaries between these worlds to disappear through the journey | + | The objective then is to integrate these disparate worlds (Primary, Secondary and Tertiary) into one and for the boundaries between these worlds to disappear through the Journey |
- | Our Secondary and Tertiary Worlds contain wisdom and solutions to the problems identified by the you in the Primary World. | + | ===== A Proposed Methodology ===== |
+ | Our Secondary and Tertiary Worlds contain wisdom and solutions to the problems identified by the you in the [[theory: | ||
The emphasis is on the knowledge that exists on the inside of our Secondary and Tertiary Worlds, thus taking the stress and responsibility away from this you in the here and now of having to resolve this. | The emphasis is on the knowledge that exists on the inside of our Secondary and Tertiary Worlds, thus taking the stress and responsibility away from this you in the here and now of having to resolve this. | ||
- | The solution is out there. With Emergent Knowledge | + | The solution is out there. With Emergent Knowledge it can be discovered. |